HEXCORE.
N° 002Services · 9 practices

What we
do.

We work across the full stack of modern engineering — but every engagement is shaped around the business outcome you're trying to achieve. Below is what we're known for. The list is the menu; the work is always tailored.

Custom Software DevelopmentDigital TransformationCloud ConsultingCloud & DevOps EngineeringCloud-Native DevelopmentAutomation TestingAI-Native DevelopmentCybersecurity & VAPTData & AICustom Software DevelopmentDigital TransformationCloud ConsultingCloud & DevOps EngineeringCloud-Native DevelopmentAutomation TestingAI-Native DevelopmentCybersecurity & VAPTData & AI
01Practices · in depth
01

Custom Software Development

Bespoke product engineering

Overview

Custom software is our oldest discipline and our default starting point. We build the systems your business runs on — from the first wireframe to the on-call rotation that keeps it healthy in year three. Our engagements typically begin with a fixed-scope discovery sprint to de-risk the build, followed by outcome-priced delivery in vertical slices. We work in cross-functional pods (product, design, engineering, QA, SRE) led by a senior architect who stays on the engagement from day one through to launch.

Capabilities
  • Web platforms (React / Next.js / Remix)
  • Mobile (iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter)
  • Backend APIs (Go, Python, Node, Java)
  • Legacy modernization & strangler-fig migrations
  • Embedded & device-side software
Methodology
  • 01Discovery sprint (1–3 weeks) — problem framing, architecture spike, risk register
  • 02Vertical-slice delivery — working software in weeks, not quarters
  • 03Trunk-based development, feature flags, continuous deployment by default
  • 04Code review on every change · 80%+ test coverage on critical paths
  • 05Observability designed in: structured logs, metrics, traces from day one
Deliverables
  • Architecture decision records (ADRs)
  • Production-grade source code under your ownership
  • Automated test suite and CI/CD pipeline
  • Runbooks and operational handover
  • 30/60/90 post-launch operating support
Sample engagement
Duration
16 weeks
Team
1 architect · 4 engineers · 1 designer · 1 QA
Shape
Outcome-priced build, weekly demos, fortnightly stakeholder review
Typical stack
TypeScriptGoPythonNext.jsPostgreSQLRedisKafka
What we don't do
  • ×Staff augmentation theatre — every engagement is outcome-owned, not seat-rented
  • ×Frameworks-of-the-month — we pick the tool that will still be loved in three years
Want to talk about a Custom Software Development engagement?Brief us →
02

Digital Transformation

Modernization at the system level

Overview

Most digital transformations fail not because the technology is wrong, but because the change is treated as an IT project. Hexcore approaches transformation as a business problem with technology consequences. We start by mapping value streams, identifying the two or three workflows that genuinely move your P&L, and re-platforming those first — proving the ROI before scaling the program. The result is transformation that the operating business actually adopts.

Capabilities
  • Enterprise discovery & roadmapping
  • Core system re-platforming
  • Process automation (RPA / event-driven)
  • Data foundation modernization
  • Change enablement & internal capability transfer
Methodology
  • 01Current-state audit · capability mapping · value-stream analysis
  • 02Target operating model and reference architecture
  • 03Phased re-platforming with parallel-run safety nets
  • 04Change enablement — playbooks, training, internal capability transfer
  • 05Quarterly outcome reviews tied to business KPIs, not vanity metrics
Deliverables
  • Capability heatmap and gap analysis
  • 12/24/36-month transformation roadmap
  • Reference architecture and tech-radar
  • Pilot delivery with measured KPIs before scale-out
  • Internal capability uplift through pairing and embedded coaching
Sample engagement
Duration
9–18 months (phased)
Team
Senior architects, embedded engineers, change lead
Shape
Quarterly steering committee · monthly executive readout
Typical stack
Domain-driven designEvent StormingWardley MappingStrangler-figHexagonal architecture
What we don't do
  • ×Big-bang rewrites that take 24 months and ship nothing
  • ×Slide-deck transformations with no working software at the end
Want to talk about a Digital Transformation engagement?Brief us →
03

Cloud Consulting

Strategy, architecture, economics

Overview

Cloud is a financial decision as much as a technical one. We treat it that way. Our cloud consulting engagements produce a defensible cloud strategy — which workloads belong where, what the 3-year TCO actually looks like, and how to migrate without lighting the budget on fire. We're cloud-vendor-agnostic; our architects hold certifications across AWS, Azure, and GCP and have shipped production workloads on all three.

Capabilities
  • Workload assessment & 6Rs analysis
  • Multi-cloud / hybrid strategy
  • Landing zones (Control Tower, Azure Landing Zones, GCP Foundation)
  • FinOps and cost optimisation
  • Cloud governance and compliance
Methodology
  • 01Workload portfolio assessment (6 Rs framework)
  • 02Total-cost-of-ownership modelling with sensitivity analysis
  • 03Landing zone and account-vending design
  • 04Migration wave planning with rollback safety
  • 05FinOps practice setup — visibility, optimisation, governance
Deliverables
  • Cloud strategy document (board-ready)
  • Landing zone reference implementation
  • Migration runbook with cutover playbook
  • FinOps dashboard and savings plan
  • Cloud Centre of Excellence operating model
Sample engagement
Duration
8–12 weeks (strategy) · 6–12 months (migration)
Team
Cloud architect · platform engineer · FinOps lead
Shape
Fixed-scope strategy phase, then T&M execution with capped budgets
Typical stack
AWSAzureGCPTerraformPulumiAWS Control TowerAzure Landing Zones
What we don't do
  • ×Lift-and-shift just to tick a cloud box — we'll tell you when on-prem still wins
  • ×Vendor lock-in we didn't argue for first
Want to talk about a Cloud Consulting engagement?Brief us →
04

Cloud & DevOps Engineering

Pipelines that ship safely

Overview

World-class engineering organisations ship to production hundreds of times a day, safely. That capability is not magic — it's a stack of compounding investments in CI/CD, IaC, observability, and developer experience. We build that stack. Our DevOps engagements typically deliver measurable improvements in deployment frequency, lead time for changes, change failure rate, and mean time to recovery — the four DORA metrics — within the first six months.

Capabilities
  • IaC (Terraform, Pulumi, CDK)
  • CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab, Argo)
  • Observability (OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog)
  • Platform engineering & IDPs (Backstage)
  • SRE & on-call enablement
Methodology
  • 01DORA baseline assessment · developer survey
  • 02Platform engineering — internal developer platforms (IDPs)
  • 03Everything-as-code: infrastructure, policy, security, runbooks
  • 04Progressive delivery: feature flags, canary, blue/green
  • 05SRE practice: SLOs, error budgets, blameless postmortems
Deliverables
  • CI/CD pipeline (multi-environment, with policy gates)
  • Terraform / Pulumi modules and reference IaC
  • Observability stack (logs, metrics, traces, alerts)
  • Incident response runbooks
  • Engineering effectiveness dashboard
Sample engagement
Duration
12–26 weeks
Team
2 platform engineers · SRE lead · embedded with your dev teams
Shape
Fixed-scope foundation, then T&M for capability extension
Typical stack
TerraformKubernetesArgoCDGitHub ActionsDatadogPrometheusBackstage
What we don't do
  • ×Tool-of-the-week thrashing — we standardise, then ship
  • ×Building a platform no engineer wants to use — DX is product work, not infra work
Want to talk about a Cloud & DevOps Engineering engagement?Brief us →
05

Cloud-Native Development

Built for elastic scale

Overview

Cloud-native isn't a buzzword for us — it's a default operating assumption: containers, declarative infrastructure, dynamic orchestration, service mesh, and event-driven decoupling, applied with restraint. We've shipped Kubernetes platforms running 4,000+ pods across multi-region, multi-tenant clusters, and we've also told clients honestly when a managed serverless platform was the better answer. The architecture serves the business; never the other way around.

Capabilities
  • Kubernetes (EKS, AKS, GKE, on-prem)
  • Serverless (Lambda, Cloud Run, Azure Functions)
  • Event-driven architectures (Kafka, EventBridge, Pub/Sub)
  • Service mesh (Istio, Linkerd)
  • Multi-tenant SaaS architectures
Methodology
  • 01Domain decomposition to identify true service boundaries
  • 02Twelve-factor application principles, applied pragmatically
  • 03Resilience patterns: circuit breakers, bulkheads, retries with jitter
  • 04Progressive delivery and zero-downtime deployment as defaults
  • 05Multi-tenancy and data isolation designed in, not bolted on
Deliverables
  • Production-grade Kubernetes platform or serverless reference
  • Service templates and golden paths
  • Multi-region HA / DR architecture
  • Event-driven integration patterns
  • Performance and load-test harness
Sample engagement
Duration
16–32 weeks
Team
Distributed systems architect · 3–5 senior engineers · SRE
Shape
Vertical-slice delivery with load testing each milestone
Typical stack
KubernetesIstioKafkaKnativeHelmArgo WorkflowsOpenTelemetry
What we don't do
  • ×Kubernetes when a single VM and a Postgres would have done it
  • ×Microservices for vanity — the right number is the smallest one that works
Want to talk about a Cloud-Native Development engagement?Brief us →
06

Automation Testing

Quality, codified

Overview

Quality is not a phase, a team, or a dashboard. Quality is a property of the system — and you build it in by codifying it. Our testing engagements design and implement a healthy test pyramid (lots of fast unit tests, fewer integration tests, a small ring of end-to-end smoke tests), wire them into the CI pipeline as policy gates, and equip your engineers to maintain it without us. The goal is sustainable test ownership, not a bloated suite that everyone resents.

Capabilities
  • E2E automation (Playwright, Cypress, Detox)
  • API contract testing (Pact)
  • Performance & load testing (k6, Gatling, Locust)
  • Mobile test automation
  • Test data management & ephemeral environments
Methodology
  • 01Test strategy audit · current-state pyramid analysis
  • 02Risk-based test prioritisation tied to business impact
  • 03Contract testing to decouple services
  • 04Performance / load testing baked into CI
  • 05Mutation testing to verify the tests themselves
Deliverables
  • Test strategy document
  • Automated regression suite (unit, integration, E2E)
  • Performance harness with baselines
  • CI policy gates and quality dashboards
  • QA enablement program for your team
Sample engagement
Duration
8–16 weeks
Team
QA architect · 2 SDETs · embedded across product teams
Shape
Fixed-scope strategy + foundation, then enablement-led
Typical stack
PlaywrightCypressk6PactJestPytestLocust
What we don't do
  • ×100% coverage for its own sake — coverage of risk is what matters
  • ×Manual test scripts living in spreadsheets
Want to talk about a Automation Testing engagement?Brief us →
07

AI-Native Development

Products with intelligence at the core

Overview

Most teams ship a demo. We ship products. The gap between a working LLM prototype and a system you can sell to enterprise customers is mostly invisible from the outside — and it's where we live. Eval harnesses, guardrails, observability, cost controls, drift detection, prompt-versioning, retrieval quality dashboards, human-in-the-loop review pipelines. The boring infrastructure that turns an impressive demo into a durable, defensible product.

Capabilities
  • RAG architectures (vector + hybrid retrieval)
  • Agent and tool-use workflows
  • Eval harnesses and offline evaluation
  • LLM orchestration (LangGraph, custom)
  • Multi-model routing and cost optimisation
Methodology
  • 01Problem framing — what is this AI actually replacing, augmenting, or unlocking?
  • 02Eval-first development: define success criteria before building
  • 03Retrieval architecture and chunking strategy aligned to the domain
  • 04Guardrails: input/output filtering, refusal handling, PII redaction
  • 05Production observability: cost, latency, quality, drift
Deliverables
  • Production RAG / agent system under your ownership
  • Eval harness with regression suite
  • Prompt registry and versioning system
  • Cost / quality / latency dashboard
  • Human review queue for low-confidence outputs
Sample engagement
Duration
10–20 weeks (prototype to production)
Team
AI architect · ML engineer · backend engineer · domain SME
Shape
Eval-gated milestones, no shipping without meeting quality bar
Typical stack
OpenAIAnthropic ClaudeVertex AIBedrockLangGraphWeaviatepgvectorRagas
What we don't do
  • ×Wrapping a single API call in a chat bubble and calling it AI
  • ×Demos that work only on cherry-picked inputs
Want to talk about a AI-Native Development engagement?Brief us →
08

Cybersecurity & VAPT

Defense, verified

Overview

Security work that produces a 200-page PDF and ends with a handshake is not security work. Our VAPT engagements end with verified fixes, regression tests for the vulnerabilities we found, and a hardened secure-SDLC practice so the same classes of bugs don't recur. Our offensive team is CREST-aligned and our consultants hold OSCP, OSCE, CISSP, and equivalent credentials. We work to a documented methodology you can audit.

Capabilities
  • Web & mobile app penetration testing
  • API and microservice security review
  • Cloud configuration review (AWS / Azure / GCP)
  • Network and infrastructure testing
  • Red team / purple team engagements
  • Compliance: ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, NDPR/GDPR
Methodology
  • 01Scoping workshop · threat modelling · STRIDE / PASTA
  • 02Black-box, grey-box, or white-box testing per scope
  • 03Manual exploitation — not just scanner output
  • 04Risk-ranked findings with remediation guidance and reproducible PoCs
  • 05Retest cycle included — we verify the fixes
Deliverables
  • Executive summary report (board-ready)
  • Technical findings with PoCs and CVSS scoring
  • Remediation roadmap with prioritisation
  • Retest report verifying fixes
  • Secure-SDLC playbook for your engineering org
Sample engagement
Duration
3–8 weeks per engagement
Team
Lead tester · 1–2 specialists · GRC consultant
Shape
Fixed-scope engagement with retest included
Typical stack
Burp Suite ProNucleiSemgrepTrivyProwlerScoutSuiteOWASP ASVS
What we don't do
  • ×Vulnerability scanning rebranded as penetration testing
  • ×Findings without reproducible proof
  • ×Reports that get filed and forgotten — we close the loop
Want to talk about a Cybersecurity & VAPT engagement?Brief us →
09

Data & AI

ML, MLOps, generative AI

Overview

Most data problems are not modelling problems — they're plumbing problems. Before we train anything, we make sure the data is reliable, observable, and contractually owned. Once the foundation is solid, we ship models with the same engineering discipline we apply to any other production system: tests, monitoring, version control, rollback. Our data & ML practice covers classical ML, deep learning, and generative AI — and we'll tell you honestly when you don't need a model at all.

Capabilities
  • Data engineering (Spark, dbt, Airflow)
  • Analytics engineering & semantic layers
  • Classical ML (tabular, time-series, forecasting)
  • Deep learning (CV, NLP)
  • Generative AI and LLM systems
  • MLOps and ModelOps
Methodology
  • 01Data audit · lineage mapping · quality SLAs
  • 02Modern data stack design: ingest, transform, serve
  • 03Feature platform for reusable model inputs
  • 04MLOps from day one — versioned data, models, and pipelines
  • 05Continuous evaluation: drift detection, fairness, performance monitoring
Deliverables
  • Data platform reference architecture
  • ELT pipelines (Airflow, dbt) with tests
  • Feature store and offline/online serving
  • Model registry and CI/CD for ML
  • Production monitoring and drift detection
Sample engagement
Duration
12–24 weeks
Team
Data architect · ML engineer · analytics engineer
Shape
Foundation-first delivery; modelling unlocked only after data SLAs hold
Typical stack
dbtAirflowSnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksMLflowFeastPyTorch
What we don't do
  • ×Models trained on data nobody trusts
  • ×ML projects with no production destination
Want to talk about a Data & AI engagement?Brief us →
02How we engage

Four ways
to work with us.

We don't insist on one engagement shape. Tell us the problem; we'll recommend the model that fits.

01

Discovery Sprint

Duration1–3 weeks
PricingFixed-price

De-risking a new build. Validating a strategic direction. Getting a defensible architecture and price before you commit.

  • Architecture decision record
  • Risk register
  • Team shape and price for the build
  • Yes/no recommendation we'll defend
02

Outcome-Priced Build

Duration8–32 weeks
PricingFixed-price · milestone-based

Well-defined builds where the scope can be locked. Aligns our incentive with shipping on time, on quality.

  • Production software under your ownership
  • Test suite & CI/CD pipeline
  • Runbooks and operational handover
  • 30/60/90 post-launch operating support
03

Embedded Squad

DurationOpen-ended
PricingT&M · monthly retainer

Ongoing capability extension. Embedded engineering inside your existing teams. Multi-product roadmaps.

  • Senior engineers integrated into your standups
  • Monthly capability review
  • Knowledge transfer at any exit point
  • Optional managed-operate transition
04

Managed Operate

Duration12-month minimum
PricingSLA-backed retainer

Production systems we built (or are willing to take ownership of) where you want SLA-backed long-term operation.

  • 24/7 on-call coverage with SLOs
  • Quarterly architectural review
  • Incident response and postmortems
  • Ongoing modernisation roadmap
03Frequently asked

Before you
brief us.

Most engagements begin with a discovery sprint — a fixed-scope, fixed-price 1–3 week phase that produces a decision-grade document: scope, architecture, risks, team shape, and a price for the build. You can act on it, take it to another vendor, or shelf it. There is no obligation to continue with us after discovery.

We offer three pricing shapes: (1) fixed-scope, fixed-price for discovery and clearly-bounded work; (2) outcome-priced for builds where the deliverable is well-defined; (3) embedded squads on T&M for ongoing capability. We avoid time-and-materials for new builds because it misaligns our incentives with yours.

Yes. Our engagement model assigns a senior architect to every project from discovery through to launch. They run the standups, write the critical code, and sit in the steering committee. We do not bait-and-switch with juniors after the sale.

Yes. We currently have active engagements across four continents. Our timezone (GMT+1) overlaps well with EMEA, Africa, and the eastern half of the Americas. We've operated alongside teams in San Francisco, London, Berlin, Nairobi, and Dubai.

Yes. We routinely sign mutual NDAs at the discovery stage, master services agreements for ongoing work, and data processing agreements where personal data is in scope (GDPR, NDPR, HIPAA where applicable). Our standard MSA is available on request.

All code produced for a client is the client's property, assigned on payment. We retain rights only to generic frameworks, internal tooling, and patterns we developed before the engagement. Source code is delivered with full history, in your repositories, under your DevOps accounts.

Hexcore is ISO 27001-aligned (certification in progress). All engineers complete annual security training. Client data is processed only on need-to-know, only in approved environments, and never copied to personal devices. Production access is auditable, time-bound, and reviewed quarterly.

We surface concerns early — usually in the weekly demo — and escalate to the steering committee within one cycle. If the original hypothesis is wrong, we re-plan in the open. We don't burn budget pretending things are fine; honest counsel is principle 06 for a reason.

Not sure which
fits your problem?